{political adept}

because those who tell don't know and those who know don't tell.

Archive for April 15th, 2009

Tax Day Becomes Protest Day – WSJ.com

Posted by rasticus on April 15, 2009

Tax Day Becomes Protest Day

How the tea parties could change American politics.

Today American taxpayers in more than 300 locations in all 50 states will hold rallies — dubbed “tea parties” — to protest higher taxes and out-of-control government spending. There is no political party behind these rallies, no grand right-wing conspiracy, not even a 501(c) group like MoveOn.org.

[Commentary] Reuters

A rally and march in protest of higher taxes in Santa Barbara, Calif., April 4.

So who’s behind the Tax Day tea parties? Ordinary folks who are using the power of the Internet to organize. For a number of years, techno-geeks have been organizing “flash crowds” — groups of people, coordinated by text or cellphone, who converge on a particular location and then do something silly, like the pillow fights that popped up in 50 cities earlier this month. This is part of a general phenomenon dubbed “Smart Mobs” by Howard Rheingold, author of a book by the same title, in which modern communications and social-networking technologies allow quick coordination among large numbers of people who don’t know each other.

In the old days, organizing large groups of people required, well, an organization: a political party, a labor union, a church or some other sort of structure. Now people can coordinate themselves.

We saw a bit of this in the 2004 and 2008 presidential campaigns, with things like Howard Dean’s use of Meetup, and Barack Obama’s use of Facebook. But this was still social-networking in support of an existing organization or campaign. The tea-party protest movement is organizing itself, on its own behalf. Some existing organizations, like Newt Gingrich’s American Solutions and FreedomWorks, have gotten involved. But they’re involved as followers and facilitators, not leaders. The leaders are appearing on their own, and reaching out to others through blogs, Facebook, chat boards and alternative media.

The protests began with bloggers in Seattle, Wash., who organized a demonstration on Feb. 16. As word of this spread, rallies in Denver and Mesa, Ariz., were quickly organized for the next day. Then came CNBC talker Rick Santelli’s Feb. 19 “rant heard round the world” in which he called for a “Chicago tea party” on July Fourth. The tea-party moniker stuck, but angry taxpayers weren’t willing to wait until July. Soon, tea-party protests were appearing in one city after another, drawing at first hundreds, and then thousands, to marches in cities from Orlando to Kansas City to Cincinnati.

As word spread, people got interested in picking a common date for nationwide protests, and decided on today, Tax Day, as the date. As I write this, various Web sites tracking tea parties are predicting anywhere between 300 and 500 protests at cities around the world. A Google Map tracking planned events, maintained at the FreedomWorks.org Web site, shows the United States covered by red circles, with new events being added every day.

The movement grew so fast that some bloggers at the Playboy Web site — apparently unaware that we’ve entered the 21st century — suggested that some secret organization must be behind all of this. But, in fact, today’s technology means you don’t need an organization, secret or otherwise, to get organized. After considerable ridicule, the claim was withdrawn, but that hasn’t stopped other media outlets from echoing it.

There’s good news and bad news in this phenomenon for establishment politicians. The good news for Republicans is that, while the Republican Party flounders in its response to the Obama presidency and its programs, millions of Americans are getting organized on their own. The bad news is that those Americans, despite their opposition to President Obama’s policies, aren’t especially friendly to the GOP. When Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele asked to speak at the Chicago tea party, his request was politely refused by the organizers: “With regards to stage time, we respectfully must inform Chairman Steele that RNC officials are welcome to participate in the rally itself, but we prefer to limit stage time to those who are not elected officials, both in Government as well as political parties. This is an opportunity for Americans to speak, and elected officials to listen, not the other way around.”

Likewise, I spoke to an organizer for the Knoxville tea party who said that no “professional politicians” were going to be allowed to speak, and he made a big point of saying that the protest wasn’t an anti-Obama protest, it was an anti-establishment protest. I’ve heard similar things from tea-party organizers in other cities, too. Though critics will probably try to write the tea parties off as partisan publicity stunts, they’re really a post-partisan expression of outrage.

Of course, it won’t be the same everywhere. There are no national rules, and organizers of each protest are doing things the way they want. And that’s the good news and the bad news for Democrats. It’s not a big Republican effort. It’s a big popular effort. But a mass movement of ordinary people who don’t feel that their voices are being heard doesn’t bode well for the party that positioned itself as the organ of hope and change.

Will these flash crowds be a flash in the pan? It’s possible that people who demonstrate today will find that experience cathartic enough — or exhausting enough — that that will be it. But it’s more likely that the tea-party movement will have an impact on the 2010 and 2012 elections, and perhaps beyond.

What’s most striking about the tea-party movement is that most of the organizers haven’t ever organized, or even participated, in a protest rally before. General disgust has drawn a lot of people off the sidelines and into the political arena, and they are already planning for political action after today.

Cincinnati organizer Mike Wilson, a novice organizer who drew 5,000 people to a rally on March 15, is now planning to create a political action committee and a permanent political organization to press for lower taxes and reduced spending. Tucson tea party organizer Robert Mayer told me that his organization will focus on city council elections in the fall as its next priority. And there’s lots of Internet chatter about ways of taking things further after today’s protests.

This influx of new energy and new talent is likely to inject new life into small-government politics around the nation. The mainstream Republican Party still seems limp and disorganized. This grassroots effort may revitalize it. Or the tea-party movement may lead to a new third party that may replace the GOP, just as the GOP replaced the fractured and hapless Whigs.

Mr. Reynolds is the author of “An Army of Davids: How Markets and Technology Empower Ordinary People to Beat Big Media, Big Government, and Other Goliaths” (Thomas Nelson, 2006). He will be covering the tea party protests today at PJTV.com.

Tax Day Becomes Protest Day – WSJ.com.

Posted in 2nd Amendment, Cannabis, Capitalism, Climate Change Scam, Constitution, Economics, Federal Reserve, Foreign Affairs, Freedom, Global Governance, National Security, Obama-nation, Policy, Politics, Rights, Scam | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

CODEPINK : CODEPINK ACTION CALENDAR

Posted by rasticus on April 15, 2009

Yay! Code Pink is crashing my Tea Party. I’m so honored!

Santa Monica Tea Party
Wednesday, April 15th 2009  4:00–5:00 PM
Santa Monica, CA

The Santa Monica Tea Party of 2009 and Tea Parties all across America are being organized by friends of Rush Limbaugh and Bill O’Reilly, all about getting less funding for government. Let’s show up with a better message: STOP funding wars and Wall Street, and start funding the needs of the people– health care, education, and a green economy. Join us as we crash their party.

Location:
Santa Monica Pier
100 Colorado Ave.
Santa Monica, CA
90401

Contact:

Audrey
la@codepinkalert.org

CODEPINK : CODEPINK ACTION CALENDAR.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

GayPatriot » Anti-Tea Party Hysteria:Opposition to Big Government Doesn’t Meet Netroots Standard for Acceptable Political Grievances

Posted by rasticus on April 15, 2009

Anti-Tea Party Hysteria:
Opposition to Big Government Doesn’t Meet Netroots Standard for Acceptable Political Grievances

The temper tantrum that all too many on left-wing blogs and even in some precincts of the MSM have been throwing in recent days as the “Tea Party movement gains greater steam has become yet another defining moment for the “netroots” and their media allies.

They can’t seem to fathom that there could be such a thing as a grassroots movement that is not only not of their making, but opposed to their ideology.  So, it must be “astroturf” (i.e., fake grassroots), in the words of one New York Times columnist.

Can you imagine how they would react if all conservative blogs repeated in unison that same mantra about the anti-Iraq War rallies, that they were not legitimate, merely made-to-order rallies orchestrated from the top down, that these people really didn’t oppose the war, they were merely goose-stepping to the instructions of the left-wing masters?

Maybe the netroots are just upset because conservatives (& libertarians) are finally using the Internet (& other new technologies) to promote our ideas.

I think it’s that –and more.  It goes to something I’ve been noticing since I defended the Gipper as an undergraduate that all too many (but fortunately not all) on the left refuse to grant any legitimacy to conservative ideas.  As Allahpundit put it,  “Nothing the right does is legitimate in liberal eyes, so there must be a disqualifying factor hidden somewhere here.

Check out this left-winger on the growing grassroots phenomenon:

This gets to the basic issue with the whole Tea Party movement.  It’s a group of f***nuts joining other groups of marginally related f***nuts to protest something or other, in a hugely f***nutty way.  The point of the Tea Party movement, besides the largest thrusting of testicles to America’s collective face since the Soviets launched Sputnik, is to protest.

Wow, sounds like someone had a bad day!  (Interesting side note: Andrew Sullivan linked that unhappy left-winger when he derided Ann Althouse’s pending nuptials.)

What makes these people so unhappy?  Why do they resort to a string of expletives to describe a grassroots movement?

Look, it’s too soon to tell whether or not we represent a majority of the American people (I happen to think we do).  There have been numerous grassroots movements throughout U.S. History which did not find success at the ballot box.  But, just because William Jennings Bryan lost three bids for the White House doesn’t mean he didn’t tap into the concerns of a certain segment of the population.

Can’t they at least acknowledge the legitimacy of our grievances?

Instead, we’re seeing is yet another example of the left’s intolerance for conservative ideas and their insensitivity to political grievances which do not fit their idea of what a political grievance should be.

Note their attempts to “crash” our rallies so as to discredit our movement.  They’ll feature the most extreme protesters (maybe even leftists in disguise) and define them as representative of our movement, much as social conservatives use pictures of the men clad only in leather harnesses to show what went on at a Gay Pride Parade.  They seek to define us by our most extreme elements.

Yep, that’s just what these folks are like, though they are loath to admit it.  They’re no different than the most extreme social conservatives eager to badmouth anything those “homosexual heathens” are doing.

Neither the netroots nor the anti-gay extremists can see the objects of their bile for what they are.  They’d rather define us by their own prejudices.

GayPatriot » Anti-Tea Party Hysteria:Opposition to Big Government Doesn’t Meet Netroots Standard for Acceptable Political Grievances.

Posted in Capitalism, Constitution, Economics, Freedom, Global Governance, Obama-nation, Policy, Politics, Rights | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »